Our Sponsors
____________________
Note: Comments are moderated so be sure that your responses are expressed in a respectable and friendly way. We are here to express our thoughts toward controversial issues, not to scold or defame anyone. Watch what you say, and remember that by using this site, you agree to our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.
Simply put, the liberal media plays the race card to defend Obama every time he makes a mistake.
I will let you figure this one out for yourselves and just give you the evidence;
1. Here we have a President who is actually half Caucasian and half Negro, yet he has NEVER publicly acknowledged that he is half Caucasian – ONLY that he is Negro . . . Not just half Negro, but that he is Negro. (I could have used the words white and black instead of Caucasian and Negro, but I would have most likely been labeled a racist for doing so)
2. He has always put the white person down as being stupid – case in point was when a black man was arrested for interfering with police and fire personnel at the scene of a house fire.
3. A statement that was aired today on the Glen Beck program where Obama in his own voice accused white CEO's of not wanting to pay taxes so that inner city kids could be educated . . .
I for one do not think that he is consciously a racist, but his Marxist brainwashing (training) from birth makes it seem so.
PapaDawg,
1. Negro is considerably more offensive a term than black.
2. That is not true. He hasn't characterized intelligence in relation to race, I would greatly enjoy some linked examples.
3. It's incredibly hard for someone who has not suffered from White America's discrimination to understand how.
Also, Marxism is staunchly opposed to racism or any social distinction that creates hierarchies. How can Marxism be contrived as racist? Isn't it the neoliberal states that subjugate people of color? Look at: Iraq, Latin America, Africa, Asia. All of these are wrought with examples of Western European (and Caucasian-dominated American) MNCs exploiting the largely colored third world.
Yep, spoken like a true idiot. Personally, I do not trust anyone who would call himself/herself Ahmed in this particular period of Earth history . . . .
If Negro is offensive to someone who is not all Negro, then Caucasian would be doubly so, would it not? Yet you failed to mention that particular tidbit of information.
Since I happen to be Caucasian, I am not offended by that term as it is biologically correct in describing my skin pigmentation.
Unfortunately you are very wrong in your description (and subsequent endorsement of) Marxism. A Marxist will use whatever means he/she can to achieve his/her stated goal, and that includes racism. It is being done even now as the Marxists that have surrounded themselves around Obama are using him just as they have used him all of his life in their last ditch attempt to subjugate and enslave the freeborn American people.
Oh, and by the way, thank you for proving my little theory correct.
Yea, it does get very old.
I agree with the fact that he has not acknowledged him of being white, but most black people these days never mention that. He did use it to his advantage though because he wanted to get into office and playing the whole race card got him there.
And it will also end his political career.
IMHO our POTUS needs to be colorless and colorblind.
PD, your xenophobia is disappointing.
Negro is a term that has been used to express brutally painful racism. Any claims of Obama being a racist can't compare to the Birmingham police dogs or fire hosing of civil rights activists. Caucasian has never been used to express the racism Negro has…
Also, I'm definitely not a Marxist. I'm just trying to correct a misinterpretation of an ideology. Yes, I have some problems with capitalism. That doesn't make me a revolutionary.
I'm pretty certain Marxists don't exploit structures of power to achieve their goals. Your characterization of Marxist is as profound a misconception as your definition of "people with the last name Ahmed in this particular era of history." I'll have you know I'm actually atheist. Regardless, a true Marxist is not a Soviet. Have you ever read Marx?
Your claim to atheism speaks volumes. Yes, unfortunately, Marx was required reading for the work that I was doing during my 20 years in the USMC as well as Mao's writings.
For you, I would recommend the Federalist Papers and the United States Constitution with the Gettysburg Address as a beginning reading.
If you really were interested in the reality of Marxism and its offspring Communism I would suggest that you begin by looking at the shambles of what the Soviets did in Russia and its surrounding nations that were forced behind the Iron Curtain since 1916. Mao's China isn't doing so well nowadays either as Cuba is also wallowing with Hugo Chavez's country soon to follow.
FYI; Marxism, Communism, and Socialism, along with Fascism just hasn't worked everywhere it was tried. Even France found out the hard way that those ideas are just pure junk. The only "ism" that has given the individual any kind of a chance to improve himself and raise himself above what he was born into is Capitalism. As far as I know it is the only system that allows an individual to reap the benefits of his own hard work. All other systems take that away.
The only thing about Obama that I can see is that he is not only a racist, but a very dumb one at that.
Nuff said!
Well the last time I was there, race played pretty well, considering he’s never played a role before.
Personally I think he should stick with the wind instruments.
And he does need to tune his vocal skills.
But with more fervor, in time he will be the best.
Lets give race a big hand!