How should the U.S. Department of Homeland Security combat anti-Muslim sentiment?
____________________ Note: Comments are moderated so be sure that your responses are expressed in a respectable and friendly way. We are here to express our thoughts toward controversial issues, not to scold or defame anyone. Watch what you say, and remember that by using this site, you agree to our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Well they already had their hands full but now after the Fort Hood shooting, things will escalate once again. They have to go around the U.S. and show statistics and explain to the people that the majority of Muslims are not terrorists.
There is no need for domestic terrorism against any mosques here.
Jared said on Nov/22/2009
These people are crazy. Just kill them all.
Pusty said on Nov/22/2009
Are you serious Jared? That is the most racist thing I’ve heard on this site.
Sal said on Nov/23/2009
Yeah Jared that is not very nice.
Jared said on Nov/23/2009
Racist. You have got to be kidding me. Everyone feels the exact same way I do, it's just that no one is willing to admit it.
Pusty said on Nov/22/2009
How can you rationalize eliminating an entire ethnicity because of a few bad apples. You are very wrong Jared, America is very accepting of any people (note the only way Obama is president is because of his race, he took advantage of a nation that strives to avoid being called racist). But I get the feeling that your just trying to get me and everyone else riled up.
#1- Well, I disagree with the fundamental with the DHS system, so I'm probaby biased. I also think it should just get out of our lives.
#2- I think that such sentiment, whether based on the basis of race or religion, is something that will always be with us. I think the answer is every citizen mobilizing and helping their friends to see that most Muslims are just not dangerous. It's sad that many think all Muslims think like bin Laden, which is far from true.
Race is determined by the shape of the skull, not by which direction one kneels while praying. Islam is not a race. It is a totalitarian ideology determined to take over the world, by the sword if necessary. If you don't know this then your debate points are feckless and void.
It's up to Muslims to show that Muslims are not a threat, it's not up to me or you.
When so-called moderate Muslims start turning their so-called radical brothers in to the cops and FBI, then they will begin to earn our trust. Til then, there is no reason to trust any of them.
No I think our friend Pusty is a very proud Cannuck(did I spell that right?)
Pusty said on Nov/23/2009
Jared you miss my point entirely. We used to made broad generalizations such as throwing the Japanese in camps, and eliminating the native americans. But now the pendulum has swung, we realize our mistakes and try desperatly to correct them, many years later.
Yes, I deeply apologize for using the wrong term, ethnicity. I realize this error now, and agree that it is a religion.
Yes, believe me Undaunted I am very aware of what Islams believe. (Watch the documentary “Obsessed”) But I also know that most muslums are good people, who are ashamed of what the few radicals are doing. They protest in the streets, they contribute to society, they are hard working people.
Pusty said on Nov/23/2009
OK, so what does the First Amendment have to do with giving people the right to kill any Muslum they want without reason. (Bomb the mosques) You know Undaunted, that’s the exact same thinking that lead all japanese people to be sent to camps during the world wars. I thought we all realized that they were innocent.
Yeah I am a very proud Canucker (so close LT, just lose the extra u). But what does that have to do with the fact that I don’t have as much knowledge about American laws than the average American. I remember in grade 5 I named all 50 American states and capitals, and my American friends barely knew any. Canada is overshadowed by American culture, massively, it’s unfortunate.
Innocent people in Gitmo? You are a moron. Those men were captured on the battlefield, fighting against American soldiers. Some fo them were responsible, by their own admission, for the murders on 9-11-01. You are a idiot.
Watching "Obsessed" is a good start but they're not called "Islams". Muslims practice the so-called religion of Islam. Get it? If they're all soooo good, where were they after Ft Hood? Where were they when the jihadist shot the soldier in Arkansas last spring? Where were they when the Islamist shot up the Jewish Center in Seattle? Where were they when the Islamist ran over students at UNC Chapel Hill or the Jews in San Francisco? You're fooling yourself. Where were they after 9-11-01 besides dancing in the streets of Muslim cities ~ and Seattle ~ in celebration of the attacks. You need to wake up. Do you know about the Muslim doctine of takkiya? It says they're supposed to lie to we infidels, pretend to be our friends while waiting for the day Islam can subsume the Constitution and they can have Islam running everything?
Do you know about honor killings where Muslim men, indluding several here in the US, kill their daughters for merely wanting to date American boys or wear blue jeans or lipstick or get a divorce? Do you know about female genital mutilation where Muslim fathers and mothers force their little girls to have their clitoris and labia hacked off in order to honor her future husband? Do you know about "The Perfect Day"? Do you have any idea what you're calling good?
Pusty said on Nov/23/2009
Do you have any idea how scarce these radicals are. I agree that the radicals are not good. I was explaining that the ones who work hard, contribute to society.. etc. are good people.
All I’m saying is that I don’t want to “bomb the mosques” (Andrew Clunn) based on a rash generalization. Absolutely, the people who you describe deserve to be brought to justice. But all we can do is hope that the FBI and CIA are on top of the terrorist’s plans. And hope, a massive slaughtering of muslums would make us the same as them.
Pusty said on Nov/23/2009
And yes I do know about honour killings and “the perfect day”. Canadian intelligence snuffed out a muslum extreimest plan to take our prime minister hostage, and slaughter our MP’s. A father forced his daughter’s vehicle off a cliff, because she was rebellious, it was an “honour killing”. I’m sorry but I want justice for the guilty, not the innocent.
Some of them were also captured by forces in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey. Some of them were also coerced by plays on their fears to admit things that are admittedly false. Some of them are only cooks in the Taliban. Some of them were coerced into joining the Taliban due to threats on their families. Some of them are just little boys. Some of them are old men.
But the people who practice it are not necessarily. There are many moderate Muslims, just as there are radical Muslims. There are also radical Christians. Are we going to bomb their churches just because we don't agree with them?
We should not use 'evil' to justify mindless violence. That will get us absolutely nowhere. Pusty is right. That is what provoked the mass incarceration of Japanese people after Pearl Harbor. That is what caused Hitler to kill millions of Jews, Gypsies, and Catholics during his Holocaust. That is what has provoked thousands of horrible acts over the ages. It is not something we should want to condone, accept, or perpetrate in any way.
Let the radicals be punished for what they are- the right way. Let the moderates live their lives how they wish. They have that right.
Jared said on Nov/25/2009
The world needs more people like us.
Jared said on Nov/25/2009
Thank you Liberty. I didn't see this comment fast enough. He's believing the media on that one.
Jared said on Nov/25/2009
Do you have any idea how many people are named Jared in America. If anything they'd go after the Subway guy.
Sal said on Nov/25/2009
There is no reason to trust anyone, regardless of the belief system or ethnicity.
There's no such thing as a moderate. Moderates are just people who like to pretend that their morality comes from the same source as literalists, but don't really hold themselves to any standards. If you don't agree with the Bible, you're not a real Christian. If you don't agree with the Koran, you're not a real Muslim. This idea of 'moderates' is a myth. If those 'moderates' actually bothered to read the holy books they claim inspire their lives, they'd either have to become extremists or recant their faith. Otherwise they're just hypocrites.
Let me ask you- have you read the Koran or are you just going off what people have told you?
I myself have never read the Koran. It's on my to-do list. But let's admit it- if we take some passages in the Bible, we can say that the Bible condones violence against unbelievers. What about the passages in the OT where God talks about killing entire nations? So obviously, God thinks genocide is OK in certain circumstances.
But I'm pretty sure that neither you nor I believe that- but that does not make us un-Christian.
I am sorry for assuming you were a Christian. From your debate/way of speaking, I assumed.
I actually own a paper copy of the Koran (or Qur'an, which looks so much cooler. ) and am planning on reading it soon. I want to find out for myself if the radicals are merely taking Mohammad's words out of context, or if his book actually says that. ^.^
Okay, first atheism is not the equivalent of religion atheism is the equivalent of theism. So there are secular philosophies which could be said to be like religions (examples are Marxism, Humanism, Objectivism, Skepticism) They each have their own doctrines. lumping all atheists together is like lumping together all people who believe in some form of god(s)
And yes. I do judge each secular world view by its founding documents / books. If you don't take a religion / philosophy to heart, then don't claim to be a member of it, that's disingenuous. Take the texts literally, if you don't then you're admitting that there's an external set of criteria that supersede the text as the founding principles of your world view. So any non-literalist really believes in something that they have not bothered to clearly define. That's fine if you're still searching. but if you don't know what you believe, then what right do you have to take the religion of faithful people and delude it and call yourself a Christian / Muslim / etc?
I think it should be taken on a case-by-case basis. There are radical Christians. There are radical Buddhists. There are radical Athiests. There are radical Muslims.
Let me ask you- as an athiest (sorry for assuming you were a Christian, BTW. You sounded kind of like one. *headslap*) do you judge your own sect of the population by the radicals who think religious people should be prevented from having children, and should be forced to 'acclimate' (in other words- believe what 'science' tells us) whether we want to or no?
Should I judge all athiests by that? I have heard athiests say this. They're insane. But they are no less insane than the Muslims who state that all people who do not believe Allah should be killed. Or the Christians who say abortion doctors should be slaughtered whole-sale.
That is not right ,as I am sure we can all agree. We should not judge an entire set of people just because a few take a couple commands/ideas out of context.
Pusty said on Nov/25/2009
Would you happen to know where that is in the bible Liberty? It would be interesting to see.
Even if it is in their it was in the old testament. Most people know that their is a big difference between the two testaments. Read the new testament then tell me that God wants to kill all non-believers.
Ermanarich said on Nov/28/2009
Pardon me for interrupting the flow of this thread
But I just wanted to insert my own "anti muslim sentiment" here…
“how should homeland security COMBAT ATI MUSLIM SENTIMENTS”!!!!
Are you people crazy?! How about homeland security first deals with combating Jihad extremists living in the united states not to mention the rest of the world, with a deep hatred and disdain for anything remotely western or non Muslim, ie. ATI-WESTERN sentiments. Islam is a RELIGION, not culture, not race, not ethnicity, etc…it is first and foremost an IDEOLOGY. Sharia is a totalitarian political ideologist system (institution) of oppression with the same strong anti-non Muslim sentiment. Unless your really good at multi tasking I propose we take care of one problem before taking on another. Frankly, our plate is full.
Well they already had their hands full but now after the Fort Hood shooting, things will escalate once again. They have to go around the U.S. and show statistics and explain to the people that the majority of Muslims are not terrorists.
There is no need for domestic terrorism against any mosques here.
These people are crazy. Just kill them all.
Are you serious Jared? That is the most racist thing I’ve heard on this site.
Yeah Jared that is not very nice.
Racist. You have got to be kidding me. Everyone feels the exact same way I do, it's just that no one is willing to admit it.
How can you rationalize eliminating an entire ethnicity because of a few bad apples. You are very wrong Jared, America is very accepting of any people (note the only way Obama is president is because of his race, he took advantage of a nation that strives to avoid being called racist). But I get the feeling that your just trying to get me and everyone else riled up.
I think Jared is joking, trying to start a flame war… at least I hope that's the case…
America is accepting? Is that why we threw all those asians in camps, or why innocent people are in Guantanamo Bay right now?
(Insert Sarcasm) Well it was a hilarious joke.
I hope you know, Jared that if your future employer finds this site when they research you, they might not find it as funny.
Well, first strike against your debate: Muslim isn't an ethnicity, it's a belief system. Please discuss accordingly.
Oy Vay! You REALLY want my opinion on this one? o.0 B)
#1- Well, I disagree with the fundamental with the DHS system, so I'm probaby biased. I also think it should just get out of our lives.
#2- I think that such sentiment, whether based on the basis of race or religion, is something that will always be with us. I think the answer is every citizen mobilizing and helping their friends to see that most Muslims are just not dangerous. It's sad that many think all Muslims think like bin Laden, which is far from true.
I am. Fuck Muhammad. Islam is evil. Want to win the war on terror? Start bombing the real targets, the mosques.
I would love that.
Islam is not very nice, Sal. What do yo know about it other than what Muslims and their apologist tell you?
Race is determined by the shape of the skull, not by which direction one kneels while praying. Islam is not a race. It is a totalitarian ideology determined to take over the world, by the sword if necessary. If you don't know this then your debate points are feckless and void.
Pusty, you need to study the First Amemdment. Do you even live in America?
It's up to Muslims to show that Muslims are not a threat, it's not up to me or you.
When so-called moderate Muslims start turning their so-called radical brothers in to the cops and FBI, then they will begin to earn our trust. Til then, there is no reason to trust any of them.
lets hear it papadawg. But let me open another tab to google, and brace myself for another not so humble opinion!
No I think our friend Pusty is a very proud Cannuck(did I spell that right?)
Jared you miss my point entirely. We used to made broad generalizations such as throwing the Japanese in camps, and eliminating the native americans. But now the pendulum has swung, we realize our mistakes and try desperatly to correct them, many years later.
Yes, I deeply apologize for using the wrong term, ethnicity. I realize this error now, and agree that it is a religion.
Yes, believe me Undaunted I am very aware of what Islams believe. (Watch the documentary “Obsessed”) But I also know that most muslums are good people, who are ashamed of what the few radicals are doing. They protest in the streets, they contribute to society, they are hard working people.
OK, so what does the First Amendment have to do with giving people the right to kill any Muslum they want without reason. (Bomb the mosques) You know Undaunted, that’s the exact same thinking that lead all japanese people to be sent to camps during the world wars. I thought we all realized that they were innocent.
Yeah I am a very proud Canucker (so close LT, just lose the extra u). But what does that have to do with the fact that I don’t have as much knowledge about American laws than the average American. I remember in grade 5 I named all 50 American states and capitals, and my American friends barely knew any. Canada is overshadowed by American culture, massively, it’s unfortunate.
err extra n, whatever.
Innocent people in Gitmo? You are a moron. Those men were captured on the battlefield, fighting against American soldiers. Some fo them were responsible, by their own admission, for the murders on 9-11-01. You are a idiot.
Watching "Obsessed" is a good start but they're not called "Islams". Muslims practice the so-called religion of Islam. Get it? If they're all soooo good, where were they after Ft Hood? Where were they when the jihadist shot the soldier in Arkansas last spring? Where were they when the Islamist shot up the Jewish Center in Seattle? Where were they when the Islamist ran over students at UNC Chapel Hill or the Jews in San Francisco? You're fooling yourself. Where were they after 9-11-01 besides dancing in the streets of Muslim cities ~ and Seattle ~ in celebration of the attacks. You need to wake up. Do you know about the Muslim doctine of takkiya? It says they're supposed to lie to we infidels, pretend to be our friends while waiting for the day Islam can subsume the Constitution and they can have Islam running everything?
Do you know about honor killings where Muslim men, indluding several here in the US, kill their daughters for merely wanting to date American boys or wear blue jeans or lipstick or get a divorce? Do you know about female genital mutilation where Muslim fathers and mothers force their little girls to have their clitoris and labia hacked off in order to honor her future husband? Do you know about "The Perfect Day"? Do you have any idea what you're calling good?
Do you have any idea how scarce these radicals are. I agree that the radicals are not good. I was explaining that the ones who work hard, contribute to society.. etc. are good people.
All I’m saying is that I don’t want to “bomb the mosques” (Andrew Clunn) based on a rash generalization. Absolutely, the people who you describe deserve to be brought to justice. But all we can do is hope that the FBI and CIA are on top of the terrorist’s plans. And hope, a massive slaughtering of muslums would make us the same as them.
And yes I do know about honour killings and “the perfect day”. Canadian intelligence snuffed out a muslum extreimest plan to take our prime minister hostage, and slaughter our MP’s. A father forced his daughter’s vehicle off a cliff, because she was rebellious, it was an “honour killing”. I’m sorry but I want justice for the guilty, not the innocent.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/11/archbishop-iraqi-christians-suffer-religious-persecution-caused-by-a-social-system-that-is-inspired.html
Stop deluding yourself with political correctness. Islam is evil.
Some of them were also captured by forces in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey. Some of them were also coerced by plays on their fears to admit things that are admittedly false. Some of them are only cooks in the Taliban. Some of them were coerced into joining the Taliban due to threats on their families. Some of them are just little boys. Some of them are old men.
None of them have gotten fair trials.
Look at this way. What about the extremist Christians? What about the Inquisition? Phelps the gay-crazy pastor? The abortion doctor shootings?
Oh, but those aren't Christians! They're crazies!
Same basic principle.
But the people who practice it are not necessarily. There are many moderate Muslims, just as there are radical Muslims. There are also radical Christians. Are we going to bomb their churches just because we don't agree with them?
We should not use 'evil' to justify mindless violence. That will get us absolutely nowhere. Pusty is right. That is what provoked the mass incarceration of Japanese people after Pearl Harbor. That is what caused Hitler to kill millions of Jews, Gypsies, and Catholics during his Holocaust. That is what has provoked thousands of horrible acts over the ages. It is not something we should want to condone, accept, or perpetrate in any way.
Let the radicals be punished for what they are- the right way. Let the moderates live their lives how they wish. They have that right.
The world needs more people like us.
Thank you Liberty. I didn't see this comment fast enough. He's believing the media on that one.
Do you have any idea how many people are named Jared in America. If anything they'd go after the Subway guy.
There is no reason to trust anyone, regardless of the belief system or ethnicity.
Well, as an atheist myself, I can non-hypocritically state that I judge all religions (and in fact all belief systems) by their literalists.
There's no such thing as a moderate. Moderates are just people who like to pretend that their morality comes from the same source as literalists, but don't really hold themselves to any standards. If you don't agree with the Bible, you're not a real Christian. If you don't agree with the Koran, you're not a real Muslim. This idea of 'moderates' is a myth. If those 'moderates' actually bothered to read the holy books they claim inspire their lives, they'd either have to become extremists or recant their faith. Otherwise they're just hypocrites.
Let me ask you- have you read the Koran or are you just going off what people have told you?
I myself have never read the Koran. It's on my to-do list.
But let's admit it- if we take some passages in the Bible, we can say that the Bible condones violence against unbelievers. What about the passages in the OT where God talks about killing entire nations? So obviously, God thinks genocide is OK in certain circumstances.
But I'm pretty sure that neither you nor I believe that- but that does not make us un-Christian.
Here's the Koran
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/k/koran/browse.html
And I'm not a Christian. I'm an Objectivist.
I am sorry for assuming you were a Christian. From your debate/way of speaking, I assumed.
I actually own a paper copy of the Koran (or Qur'an, which looks so much cooler.
) and am planning on reading it soon. I want to find out for myself if the radicals are merely taking Mohammad's words out of context, or if his book actually says that. ^.^
Okay, first atheism is not the equivalent of religion atheism is the equivalent of theism. So there are secular philosophies which could be said to be like religions (examples are Marxism, Humanism, Objectivism, Skepticism) They each have their own doctrines. lumping all atheists together is like lumping together all people who believe in some form of god(s)
And yes. I do judge each secular world view by its founding documents / books. If you don't take a religion / philosophy to heart, then don't claim to be a member of it, that's disingenuous. Take the texts literally, if you don't then you're admitting that there's an external set of criteria that supersede the text as the founding principles of your world view. So any non-literalist really believes in something that they have not bothered to clearly define. That's fine if you're still searching. but if you don't know what you believe, then what right do you have to take the religion of faithful people and delude it and call yourself a Christian / Muslim / etc?
I think it should be taken on a case-by-case basis. There are radical Christians. There are radical Buddhists. There are radical Athiests. There are radical Muslims.
Let me ask you- as an athiest (sorry for assuming you were a Christian, BTW. You sounded kind of like one. *headslap*) do you judge your own sect of the population by the radicals who think religious people should be prevented from having children, and should be forced to 'acclimate' (in other words- believe what 'science' tells us) whether we want to or no?
Should I judge all athiests by that? I have heard athiests say this. They're insane. But they are no less insane than the Muslims who state that all people who do not believe Allah should be killed. Or the Christians who say abortion doctors should be slaughtered whole-sale.
That is not right ,as I am sure we can all agree. We should not judge an entire set of people just because a few take a couple commands/ideas out of context.
Would you happen to know where that is in the bible Liberty? It would be interesting to see.
Even if it is in their it was in the old testament. Most people know that their is a big difference between the two testaments. Read the new testament then tell me that God wants to kill all non-believers.
Pardon me for interrupting the flow of this thread
But I just wanted to insert my own "anti muslim sentiment" here…
“how should homeland security COMBAT ATI MUSLIM SENTIMENTS”!!!!
Are you people crazy?! How about homeland security first deals with combating Jihad extremists living in the united states not to mention the rest of the world, with a deep hatred and disdain for anything remotely western or non Muslim, ie. ATI-WESTERN sentiments. Islam is a RELIGION, not culture, not race, not ethnicity, etc…it is first and foremost an IDEOLOGY. Sharia is a totalitarian political ideologist system (institution) of oppression with the same strong anti-non Muslim sentiment. Unless your really good at multi tasking I propose we take care of one problem before taking on another. Frankly, our plate is full.