Comments on: Is condom distribution smart health policy?

By: marylee333

marylee333 — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:20:59 +0000

GAK!! ive seen that so often it makes me sick!! people should only have sex with people that they would want to have a family with. of course, thats not usually the case.

By: marylee333

marylee333 — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:19:39 +0000

I dont think people should have sex until they are ready to have a kid, because even if they do use a condom, there still is a chance that the girl might get pregnant.

the thing that gets me is that as soon as a guys sleeps around, hes a cool player, and when a chick does that, shes a slut. i dont see the logic, not that i promote it.

By: Liberaltarian91

Liberaltarian91 — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:54:16 +0000

Yes, its wrong to directly take someone's tax dollars to use them on contraception for somebody else. But indirectly, it would save so many of the costs that result from unwanted children.

Of course, it would be wrong to give condoms for those who can already afford them.

By: Jared

Jared — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:52:45 +0000

Drug dealers give our free samples. Department stores give our free samples. Bakeries give our free samples.

By: Sal

Sal — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:29:52 +0000

Most people will have sex with anyone that offers it, that is one of the main problems.

By: Jared

Jared — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:01:50 +0000

Yea but Sun Tzu, if you hand out condoms like that, you are pretty much saying, "Kids, you can have sex as long as you use these."

It's offering kids security in their decisions to have sex to begin with. If teenagers weren't even allowed to have condoms, they would barely have sex at all, but I know it will never happen, because of corporations and everything.

By: Chris

Chris — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:13:56 +0000

Sun Tzu, this site has so many spam filters to ensure that we don't see any useless advertisements. I found yours under one filter. The only reason why it wasn't approved is because it contains more than one link in it, which spammers love to do, post lots of links.

I apologize if I was late approving it.

By: Sun Tzu

Sun Tzu — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:18:45 +0000

And yes, it isn't your fault that this site isn't letting me post links. The frustration directed your way with that statement in particular was probably more properly directed at this website for not posting the data points I found with a cursory search.

By: Sun Tzu

Sun Tzu — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:17:08 +0000

You have not shown yourself to be informed on this topic. So yes, it's not my problem if you don't want to look into the matter and instead want to assume you are right without proper information. Google scholar just isn't that hard to use. So from my perspective it couldn't be anything other than willful ignorance to pretend 1) that scientific rigorous investigation on this topic is impossible and 2) that there are not attempts to do just that and 3) that you will not bother looking for them.

By: Andrew Clunn

Andrew Clunn — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:08:58 +0000

I should really use a spell checker…