Note: Comments are moderated so be sure that your responses are expressed in a respectable and friendly way. We are here to express our thoughts toward controversial issues, not to scold or defame anyone. Watch what you say, and remember that by using this site, you agree to our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.



I think for cars there should be compensation involved.
Yes, otherwise what are the repercussions for corporations that sell faulty products? Just issue a recall and temporary stop sales? Now if they were forced to refund consumers who have a valid recalled item, then there would be more incentive to get it right the first time.
I thought they were most of the time. Or do you mean, paying for the trip to the store as well as the cost of the product.
Replacing a faulty product with one that works, or effecting the necessary corrections to the product should be compensation enough.
The buyer should be astute enough to research the product to ascertain its reliability and viability prior to its purchase. Government should never be ones babysitter, that is the path to relinquishing all liberty.
Just my not-so-humble opinion. B)
I think everything should be.