Comments on: Should gun sales to terror suspects be allowed?

By: Constipation Remedies `

Constipation Remedies ` — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:49:49 +0000

gun control should always be imposed strictly to avoid another Columbine scenario”"~

By: Weer'd Beard

Weer'd Beard — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:28:01 +0000

I hope you're right….

By: Sun Tzu

Sun Tzu — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:13:01 +0000

There's still time for him to test his assertions against the real world yet.

I hope anyway.

By: Weer'd Beard

Weer'd Beard — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:14:13 +0000

Sure, once a person is allowed to freely speak once they take a government free speech test. Freely assemble and gather once they take a government ettiquette test.

be free from illegal search and seizures once they pass a government law test.

Ect ect. Also who gets to write the test? Obviously we should make it REALLY hard, otherwise it isn't really worth giving a test.

Human rights SHOULD be subject denial by the government, and should be granted only when a "legitimate" need is given, right?

Jared, you really scare me.

By: Weer'd Beard

Weer'd Beard — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:07:33 +0000

Actually no. For an FFL to sell a gun the ATF forms need to be properly completed and then a National instant Background Check needs to be performed (I believe the FBI runs the system) What the anti-freedom bigots want to do is link the Terror Suspect list (again people who have committed no crimes, and are likely unaware they are on a list, or why) with the NICS. So you try to buy the gun, and you'll flunk….no reason given.

So no cross-checking of lists need be done.

Just violations of the US Constitution as well as local laws…..

By: Weer'd Beard

Weer'd Beard — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:15:35 +0000

Anybody who believes that people are innocent until proven guilty, and believes in the fundamental right of personal protection.

This of course goes double for a secret government list where one cannot see what names are on it, nor how the names were placed there, or what stipulations must be met to get ones name OFF the list.

By: papadawg

papadawg — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:59:33 +0000

Who determines who is and who is not a terrorist?

The currant administration now wants to prosecute those who interrogated terrorists from the last administration, and they have already said that those of us who have been to war defending your freedom are ripe to be recruited by terrorist organizations.

Somebody needs to get a grip on life here, and it ain't me!

By: Sun Tzu

Sun Tzu — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:01:05 +0000

If you meant allowing terror suspects to have guns; I did for one. More or less.

By: Sal

Sal — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:39:11 +0000

Who the heck would say yes to that?

By: Sun Tzu

Sun Tzu — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:17:23 +0000

That takes a negative right accorded to the public that can only be denied under certain well defined legal circumstances and turns it into a positive right that the government grants you. I don't think that's the best solution at all.