Our Sponsors
____________________
Note: Comments are moderated so be sure that your responses are expressed in a respectable and friendly way. We are here to express our thoughts toward controversial issues, not to scold or defame anyone. Watch what you say, and remember that by using this site, you agree to our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.

Look, it's cool if they want to marry, but don't adopt a child. Children come from a guy and a girl having a relationship, not same-sex relationships. Getting a dog could be an alternative.
Absolutely not. It's against most religions.
Since when are we supposed to use religion to develop the legal code and be subject to its demands?
If you want to go to Heaven.
Jared, you are absurd. Children should be raised by adults who can provide a loving, caring, cultivating environment. If that happens to be provided by two males or two females, so be it.
Jared continues to scare me.
If you need to guess, I don't see what the difference between gay couples and straight couples are except in their taste in sexual partners. Of course they should be granted all the rights other people are.
And Jared, Keep your Village the hell away from my children!
It would probably mess up the kid but let people do what they want, no skin off my back.
lol so what? What does that matter to you Zack?
There's actually no evidence it would "mess up the kid". At least as far as the APA is concerned.
I don't believe in heaven.
And accepting your own teachings on such things as valid, even then you don't need to use your own moral leanings on other people in order to get yourself into heaven.
It is my personal opinion that Homosexuals and lesbians should not be allowed to adopt.
My village controls the entire world Weer'd Beard, New York City.
Well, women are good mothers, so maybe lesbians could be allowed, but homosexuals definitely not.
Lesbians, I am pretty sure, are still defined as homosexual.
Your argument sounds more like "men are not good fathers" than justifying "homosexuals not being good parents".
So where do you think we go when you die, the toilet store?
Yea, but I don't know man, from looking at male homosexuals compared to women homosexuals, I think women homosexuals are better fit to be parents.
I would think that from the current studies that show that children, particularly male children, need a father, there's a flaw in your logic. Perhaps male homosexual couples would be better suited to the task of raising a child?
exactly! i mean i personally dont encourage gay marriages but its legal now. what does thta tell you?? its ok to be gay now. its actully identified as a mental state now and i dont think we should discriminate people based on sexual orientation. and besides, who needs adopting more?? heterosexual couples who can have their own kids or homosexuals who can't have kids of their own? think about it. we say that its ok for heterosexuals to adopt children when its actually the homosexuals who need this priviledge the most! and besides isnt it better for a child to have two moms or two dads than not to have anyone at all?
no they should not its against nature…let them chose their partners but DONT ruin a childs life bc they wanna play house
divorces to bigamy, homosexual leads to what? interspecies relationships? It might not be nice to ban a homosexual person from having a kid, so we should let them. then after a while, society degrades down to, it might not be nice to ban a petifile from having a kid, so we should… let them???
how far will this go? how much will we retreat until we draw a line, until we have an uncompromising stand?
I don't think they should be allowed a kid.
I think all of you who have posted comments against homosexuals adopting children have failed to put forward a valid argument. (and need to think about how close minded and stupid you sound) You cant force your religious views on other people. How another couple lives there life and raises a child has no effect on you and you chance of getting into the heaven you choose to believe in. Homosexual relationships are proven to be just as stable (if not more in some cases) as heterosexual relationships. Allowing homosexuals to adopt children is not entering a slippery slope it is strictly proving homes for children who really need then in a caring, loving, and open minded environment.
That is ridiculous. Having a child is one of the best things in life! How can you deprive people of that joy just because they are different? I think that gay couples should have all of the same rights as anyone else. The only reason people are against it is religion. And doesn't the first amendment give us freedom of religion? Well, if you're gay, obviously you don't feel the same way, which means that denying them of a child goes against the first amendment.