<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the United States switch to the metric system?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html</link>
	<description>Have Your Voice Heard, 24/7.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-6182</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-6182</guid>
		<description>There are several reasons why the US should/will switch to metric: 
1. Measuring liquid volume will be less difficult because a liter is a cubic decimeter. 
2. Once an american switches to the metric system, they aren&#039;t going to change back. 
3. I use gigameters to measure distances inside the solar system. 
4. The population rate of the US metrication is growing by roughly 260,000 people per day. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several reasons why the US should/will switch to metric:<br />
1. Measuring liquid volume will be less difficult because a liter is a cubic decimeter.<br />
2. Once an american switches to the metric system, they aren&#039;t going to change back.<br />
3. I use gigameters to measure distances inside the solar system.<br />
4. The population rate of the US metrication is growing by roughly 260,000 people per day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-4577</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-4577</guid>
		<description>Probably won&#039;t happen. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably won&#039;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordTiberivs</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>LordTiberivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>It was dumped because Americans are too lazy to try and understand a new system. You cannot deny that the English Imperial System is overly confusing.... If you need 110 sq ft of carpeting and the carpet is sold at $10/sq yd... how much do you pay? Which hold more volume a gallon, 5 pints, or 38 fluid ounces? Whats the difference bw a fluid ounce and a weight ounce? All these questions are easily answered with metrics. Metrics are based solely on the number 10. With the EI system I need to convert sqaure yards to square feet with a division of three... and ounces to pints to gallons??? 
 
Sack up America! If Ford and Chevy started advertising kph/liter we&#039;d all pick it up extremely quickly. 
 
Also... the English Imperial Systemis so outdated you can&#039;t use it for most modern measurments.... Measurments of electricity, mass, density, frequency, magnetics, acceleration... all have to me measured in metrics. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was dumped because Americans are too lazy to try and understand a new system. You cannot deny that the English Imperial System is overly confusing&#8230;. If you need 110 sq ft of carpeting and the carpet is sold at $10/sq yd&#8230; how much do you pay? Which hold more volume a gallon, 5 pints, or 38 fluid ounces? Whats the difference bw a fluid ounce and a weight ounce? All these questions are easily answered with metrics. Metrics are based solely on the number 10. With the EI system I need to convert sqaure yards to square feet with a division of three&#8230; and ounces to pints to gallons??? </p>
<p>Sack up America! If Ford and Chevy started advertising kph/liter we&#039;d all pick it up extremely quickly. </p>
<p>Also&#8230; the English Imperial Systemis so outdated you can&#039;t use it for most modern measurments&#8230;. Measurments of electricity, mass, density, frequency, magnetics, acceleration&#8230; all have to me measured in metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloviating Zeppelin</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-4561</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloviating Zeppelin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-4561</guid>
		<description>No.  It&#039;s been tried before and dumped before.  Apparently no one around here was alive in the 70s when gas pumps read in liters and KPH was placed onto speedometers.  The KPH inner circle is still there on vehicles sold in America. 
 
BZ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  It&#039;s been tried before and dumped before.  Apparently no one around here was alive in the 70s when gas pumps read in liters and KPH was placed onto speedometers.  The KPH inner circle is still there on vehicles sold in America. </p>
<p>BZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-4550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-4550</guid>
		<description>Why not? It is more efficient. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not? It is more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-4542</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-4542</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Liberty! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Liberty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-4530</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-4530</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to switch.  Because then I&#039;d have to completely change my way of thinking.  It&#039;s hard enough for me to remember how long a mile is. &gt;.&lt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t want to switch.  Because then I&#39;d have to completely change my way of thinking.  It&#39;s hard enough for me to remember how long a mile is. &gt;.&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-4508</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-4508</guid>
		<description>Of course we should switch.  we broke off from England over 200 years ago...  Why should we worship the British King by measuring things based on his body parts? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we should switch.  we broke off from England over 200 years ago&#8230;  Why should we worship the British King by measuring things based on his body parts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordTiberivs</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-4490</link>
		<dc:creator>LordTiberivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-4490</guid>
		<description>It is definitely a more efficient system considering everything is based around tens. Rather than our old English system which uses 3, 8, 12, and 16. Frankly, even the English don&#039;t use the old English system anymore. 
It would take years for a proper transition though. American autos would change drastically, our measure of weights, and distances would be years in catching up. It would be sweeping changes that I don&#039;t think Americans are ready for: distance, volume, weight, temperature...etc all of them would be affected. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is definitely a more efficient system considering everything is based around tens. Rather than our old English system which uses 3, 8, 12, and 16. Frankly, even the English don&#039;t use the old English system anymore.<br />
It would take years for a proper transition though. American autos would change drastically, our measure of weights, and distances would be years in catching up. It would be sweeping changes that I don&#039;t think Americans are ready for: distance, volume, weight, temperature&#8230;etc all of them would be affected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.debateitout.com/should-the-united-states-switch-to-the-metric-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-4486</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debateitout.com/?p=1267#comment-4486</guid>
		<description>I think so. It&#039;s more efficient. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think so. It&#039;s more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
