Comments on: Who will be in charge of Iraq as U.S. forces leave?

By: Liberty

Liberty — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:50:27 +0000

Okay so because we have internet and they don't, and we have nukes and they don't, and we have a working electrical system and they don't….

We can just dictate to them what they can and cannot do? And rule them?

Oh yeah. That makes sense. Sounds like a way to start another war.

Liberty — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:50:27 +0000

Okay so because we have internet and they don't, and we have nukes and they don't, and we have a working electrical system and they don't….

We can just dictate to them what they can and cannot do? And rule them?

Oh yeah. That makes sense. Sounds like a way to start another war.

Jared — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:33:23 +0000

Yea, but not every nation is as advanced and well-built like we are.

Liberty — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:27:01 +0000

….The Iraqis?

Kind of like how the Americans are in charge of America, and the British are in charge of Britain….

Jared — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:18:48 +0000

They have their head in the sand, literally.

Jared — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:18:17 +0000

Exactly.

Sal — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:40:59 +0000

The Iraqis are not even in control of their own country obviously.

Sal — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:40:27 +0000

Yeah who cares, its not our problem.

papadawg — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:29:36 +0000

To answer the question as asked . . . The Iraqis will be in charge of Iraq.

Just as they are now.

Politics in other parts of the world are much different than ours, so get used to it.

Just my not-so-humble opinion. B)

Jared — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:53:44 +0000

Why do you keep saying that? It's barely being held-together now. They have to learn on their own how to handle these type of situations.